---
Welcome back, everyone, and I hope you
had a relaxing holiday weekend. I did, despite my alma mater's embattled coach
inexplicably calling a
quarterback draw in his own end zone* which resulted in a loss to our most
hated rival. But hey, on the plus side, it was a gift-wrapped present to the
Athletics Director. Time for a new direction, Lew.
*Yes, even the link to the game story
includes "miserable ending." Yikes.
In Dodger Divorce land, there's some
fallout from Frank's filing (Monday is alliteration day at DD) in which he
claimed to be pretty cash-poor. First, via Shaikin, Jamie's attorney, Bert
Fields, expresses some serious doubt as to the viability of the Dodgers under Frank:
"If it were true that he really doesn't have the resources to pay anything, then you'd have serious concern about his ability to run a baseball team," Fields said.
"If Mr. McCourt meant what he said, how is he going to pay all these guys?"
I know I probably don't need to tell
you what's wrong with that statement. Suffice it to say that Chad Billingsley
isn't being paid out of Frank's checking account. That quote reminds me of
Selig's message to Dodger fans a couple weeks ago that the Los Angeles Dodgers
are just fine; they're not leaving L.A., so things must be in great shape.
Fields and Selig, both attorneys, are very smart people. Do they not
expect the public to see right through this kind of stuff?
Jon Weisman at Dodger Thoughts would like you to know that a possible failure to offer Orlando Hudson
and Randy Wolf arbitration should not be seen as indicative of the club's
financial strength. After all, Weisman notes, the club has a history of rather
interesting arb offer decisions (Jon says "surprising"). If Hudson
and Wolf are offered arbitration and decline, of course, the Dodgers stand to
net draft picks if the two sign elsewhere. I'd imagine that clause in
Orlando Cabrera's last contract prohibiting the team from offering him
arbitration will be a popular stocking stuffer this winter.
In hot stove developments via
DiGiovanna and Hernandez, it looks like Ned Colletti landed on "NO" on the
Ouija board made the right
decision and will not include Billingsley or Kershaw in a deal for Halladay. Thank goodness. I wonder
if the Jays would be content with a package built around Carlos Santana.
Free agent shortstop Marco Scutaro "prefers" the Dodgers and Red Sox. If he meets with McCourt,
will he even know which club is pitching for his services? Seriously though, I
don't really understand where Scutaro fits in. He has one of the odder career arcs in recent memory, turning in a 4.5 win season (!)
at age 33. He was very good the year before, too, his first season in
Toronto. Previously, he'd posted six largely nondescript seasons with the Mets
and Athletics. Something to do with exchange rates, perhaps. He says the
Dodgers would want him to play second.
I'm a big believer in the "at the
right price" model of general managing. Yes, Matt Kemp is available. But
you'd better have Zack Greinke or Hanley Ramirez on the other end. So I'm not
automatically opposed to
adding Scutaro, but is the price (money, draft picks, blocking the position
with a multi-year deal) worth the production? Scutaro's fielding numbers have
been all over the map, but then again, so has he. Since 2002, he's logged over
500 innings at shortstop, third, and second. He's also played first, left,
right, and the ominously ambiguous "OF." In 2007, he butchered third
and second while playing a passable short and hitting like a catcher. In 2008,
he dazzled at short and hit like...well...a catcher. In 2009, he was mediocre
again at short, but hit like a second baseman.
Confused? I am. Jason Rosenberg, too. Rob Neyer thinks he knows. An odd duck, this
Scutaro. Lastly, Diamond Leung notes that
Chien-Ming Wang is "open" to pitching for the Dodgers. Of course, so
am I.
Now that we're only a couple weeks
away from our much-discussed December 15 hearings, I expect divorce news to
pick up. I know the holiday was last weekend, but thanks for being along for
the ride.
---
No Scutaro.
ReplyDeletePicks, blocking the position. Can't do it.
Just the type of thing Colletti would do though.
Sometimes people do need time to rest, which he must devote idleness. But if it goes on from day to day, if end in sight in sight, so we are trapped in
ReplyDeleteWith the modification in the economic state of affairs, factors like globalization of markets, international economic amalgamation, reduced obstacles to business and trade and increase in competition have given rise to the requirement of transportation. It has become one of the most vital infrastructural essential for the expansion of business in today’s era.
ReplyDeleteMovers and Packers Hyderabad
Movers and Packers in Kondapur
Movers and Packers in Gachibowli
Movers and Packers in Kukatpally
Movers and Packers in Chanda Nagar
A house is made up of bricks and walls, but it becomes a home when filled with love and happiness. We’re sure you can’t wait to get there and fill your new home with lots of happy memories, we’ll show you the quickest way to do that with reliable Packers and Movers Hyderabad. If you’re planning to search for packers and movers in Hyderabad through Google search engine or directory websites, you’ll definitely get a huge list of moving companies, without any information about how trustworthy they actually are. If you’re not sure about their authenticity, you could easily end up giving all your household things to fraudulent moving companies who may rob you blind. The simple solution to avoid such circumstances is to hire genuine and best packers and movers Hyderabad through AssureShift. Here we give you a list of pre-verified and professional movers and packers Hyderabad who provide you with reliable shifting solutions
ReplyDeletePackers and Movers in Hyderabad
Packers and Movers in Jubilee Hills
Packers and Movers in Banjara Hills
Packers and Movers in Kondapur
Packers and Movers in Madhapur
Packers and Movers in Gachibowli
Packers and Movers in Chanda Nagar