tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7510607242317232328.post4504963587338822754..comments2024-02-27T07:21:31.051-08:00Comments on Dodger Divorce: A quick clarification.Josh Fisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04917981297181251768noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7510607242317232328.post-78763363837111631892010-09-23T21:13:45.518-07:002010-09-23T21:13:45.518-07:00In case this clarification, in itself, wasn't ...In case this clarification, in itself, wasn't clear: Frank McCourt, through a variety of entities, has in his name 100% ownership of the Dodgers. Any claim Jamie has to the team would have to come through a determination of the Dodgers as community property.<br /><br />Phrased differently, if the Massachusetts MPA holds, Jamie will be very hard pressed to assert any ownership claim by virtue Josh Fisherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04917981297181251768noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7510607242317232328.post-9632011914400124132010-09-23T20:09:38.716-07:002010-09-23T20:09:38.716-07:00A readers comments on the LA Times blog earlier-
...A readers comments on the LA Times blog earlier-<br /><br />"I can see no way that this testimony is not a game changer for both parties. Frank just lost half the Dodgers and Jamie just gained half the debt Frank bought the Dodgers with. In addition, and no one mentions this, Frank just got himself one half of the couples only true assets...the houses.<br /><br />The good news: the Dodgers Tony Forkushhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06232559465611934066noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7510607242317232328.post-63787021118821382142010-09-23T19:41:36.389-07:002010-09-23T19:41:36.389-07:00*feel better**feel better*Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7510607242317232328.post-39611630120931616632010-09-23T19:35:36.942-07:002010-09-23T19:35:36.942-07:00Adrian, if it makes you better, I hate Jamie not b...Adrian, if it makes you better, I hate Jamie not because she's Jewish, but rather because she's a greedy c*nt.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7510607242317232328.post-67230685496419053462010-09-23T19:20:11.069-07:002010-09-23T19:20:11.069-07:00Adrian,
As a Jew, I take particular umbrage to yo...Adrian,<br /><br />As a Jew, I take particular umbrage to your anti-semitic accusation of Josh. It is baseless and offensive. Unless you have credence for such a remark, better to not embarrass yourself on this forum. There are better things to write.Tony Forkushhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06232559465611934066noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7510607242317232328.post-65414065079291428842010-09-23T18:08:25.146-07:002010-09-23T18:08:25.146-07:00Sorry guys but McCourt will settle and will sign a...Sorry guys but McCourt will settle and will sign a front load TV deal with FOX to pay off Jamie. McCourt wants to keep the team. he has no money and the only way he can keep the team is selling his TV rights to FOX.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7510607242317232328.post-19389419166993189362010-09-23T17:31:09.378-07:002010-09-23T17:31:09.378-07:00It appears to me that the writer of the blog has a...It appears to me that the writer of the blog has a bias aginst Jamie. Is that because he thinks the business of baseball should belong only to the "boys"? Or is it because Jamie is Jewish? Just wondering ...Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03040268714219692456noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7510607242317232328.post-51813226971510029982010-09-23T12:55:58.019-07:002010-09-23T12:55:58.019-07:00LA Times reports --
"Jamie's attorney, Da...LA Times reports --<br />"Jamie's attorney, David Boies, said outside the courtroom that Jamie could not recall that particular phone conversation she had with Silverstein. But Boies said that whatever she told Silverstein prompted the attorney to change the draft "as soon as he got off the phone with her" — inserting language that excluded the Dodgers from Frank's sole Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7510607242317232328.post-21749970779757907072010-09-23T12:45:29.217-07:002010-09-23T12:45:29.217-07:00The AP Reports Silverstein testified --
"Sh...The AP Reports Silverstein testified -- <br /><br />"She never once said the Dodgers or any of his other businesses shouldn't be in Frank's column," Silverstein said. "She never indicated that she ever wanted to have ownership in Frank's businesses."<br /><br />If that isn't spinning, you're never been spun. The question is whether she ever indicated that Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7510607242317232328.post-54221244395698385712010-09-23T12:35:25.961-07:002010-09-23T12:35:25.961-07:00Clear as mud--
"Judge Gordon has already info...Clear as mud--<br />"Judge Gordon has already informed the parties that his mind is mostly made up on the issue of whether Jamie McCourt has any existing ownership interest in the Dodgers. The answer is no, and Frank's remaining witnesses supporting that conclusion have been provisionally excused."<br /><br />and <br /><br />"If Judge Gordon throws out the MPA, Jamie absolutelyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7510607242317232328.post-86850142327499620552010-09-23T08:55:59.496-07:002010-09-23T08:55:59.496-07:00Wait, I'm confused, in the 4th graf of the pre...Wait, I'm confused, in the 4th graf of the previous post, you commented that Gordon has made up his mind regarding Jamie's ownership of the Dodgers, no?Greg Haohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01805996565667458046noreply@blogger.com